Ranking: A reproducible semiobjective means of evaluating overall resident performance

David J. Curtis; E. Stephen Amis; David F. Cruess; Daniel D. Riordan

doi:10.1097/00004424-198510000-00019

Ranking: A reproducible semiobjective means of evaluating overall resident performance

David J. Curtis^*, E. Stephen Amis, David F. Cruess, Daniel D. Riordan

^*Corresponding author for this work

Affiliated

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Eleven staff radiologists evaluated resident performance by independent subjective ranking regardless of residency year. A pooled ranking correlated with a ranking obtained from the total raw score of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Inservice Examination (P <.005). The staff pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.70, with resident overall performance upon the ACR Inservice Examination. The pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.90, with a subsequent pooled ranking obtained six months later (P <.0001). This method of ranking accurately predicts ACR Inservice Examination performance and appears to evaluate the objectivity of the staff radiologists involved.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	757-758
Number of pages	2
Journal	Investigative Radiology
Volume	20
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-198510000-00019
State	Published - Oct 1985

Keywords

ACR inservice test
Performance
Resident
Standardized
Testing

Access to Document

10.1097/00004424-198510000-00019

Cite this

@article{4ed97d96109c45f8a49f33cdce81847e,

title = "Ranking: A reproducible semiobjective means of evaluating overall resident performance",

abstract = "Eleven staff radiologists evaluated resident performance by independent subjective ranking regardless of residency year. A pooled ranking correlated with a ranking obtained from the total raw score of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Inservice Examination (P <.005). The staff pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.70, with resident overall performance upon the ACR Inservice Examination. The pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.90, with a subsequent pooled ranking obtained six months later (P <.0001). This method of ranking accurately predicts ACR Inservice Examination performance and appears to evaluate the objectivity of the staff radiologists involved.",

keywords = "ACR inservice test, Performance, Resident, Standardized, Testing",

author = "Curtis, {David J.} and {Stephen Amis}, E. and Cruess, {David F.} and Riordan, {Daniel D.}",

year = "1985",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1097/00004424-198510000-00019",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "757--758",

journal = "Investigative Radiology",

issn = "0020-9996",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ranking

T2 - A reproducible semiobjective means of evaluating overall resident performance

AU - Curtis, David J.

AU - Stephen Amis, E.

AU - Cruess, David F.

AU - Riordan, Daniel D.

PY - 1985/10

Y1 - 1985/10

N2 - Eleven staff radiologists evaluated resident performance by independent subjective ranking regardless of residency year. A pooled ranking correlated with a ranking obtained from the total raw score of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Inservice Examination (P <.005). The staff pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.70, with resident overall performance upon the ACR Inservice Examination. The pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.90, with a subsequent pooled ranking obtained six months later (P <.0001). This method of ranking accurately predicts ACR Inservice Examination performance and appears to evaluate the objectivity of the staff radiologists involved.

AB - Eleven staff radiologists evaluated resident performance by independent subjective ranking regardless of residency year. A pooled ranking correlated with a ranking obtained from the total raw score of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Inservice Examination (P <.005). The staff pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.70, with resident overall performance upon the ACR Inservice Examination. The pooled ranking had a Spearman rank correlation, r =.90, with a subsequent pooled ranking obtained six months later (P <.0001). This method of ranking accurately predicts ACR Inservice Examination performance and appears to evaluate the objectivity of the staff radiologists involved.

KW - ACR inservice test

KW - Performance

KW - Resident

KW - Standardized

KW - Testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022410966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004424-198510000-00019

DO - 10.1097/00004424-198510000-00019

M3 - Article

C2 - 4066246

AN - SCOPUS:0022410966

SN - 0020-9996

VL - 20

SP - 757

EP - 758

JO - Investigative Radiology

JF - Investigative Radiology

IS - 7

ER -

Ranking: A reproducible semiobjective means of evaluating overall resident performance

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this