TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-World Effectiveness of Upadacitinib for Perianal Crohn’s Disease
T2 - A Multicenter Retrospective Study
AU - Devi, Jalpa
AU - Patel, Anish
AU - Quraishi, Baseer
AU - Dev, Bharati
AU - Tan, Tingyi
AU - Kline, Meredith
AU - Chowla, Navreet
AU - Ramesh, Prajith Raj
AU - Ballard, David H.
AU - Huang, Lulu
AU - Jaiprada, Fnu
AU - Samaan, Sami
AU - Stone, Molly
AU - Khan, Abdul
AU - Seeraj, Alyssa Anita
AU - Alanazi, Sami
AU - Xu, Anthony
AU - Maas, Laura
AU - Jajoo, Arpita
AU - Parian, Alyssa
AU - Altinmakas, Emre
AU - Ehman, Eric C.
AU - Davenport, Matthew S.
AU - Li, Sophia
AU - Chithriki, Mamata
AU - Shukla, Richa
AU - McCurdy, Jeff
AU - Yarur, Andres J.
AU - Bishu, Shrinivas
AU - Johnson, Amanda M.
AU - Benjamin, McDonald
AU - Dulaney, David
AU - Serre-Yu, Wong
AU - Deepak, Parakkal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s).
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - Background & Aims A post-hoc analyses of phase III trials showed efficacy of upadacitinib in perianal Crohn’s disease, but real-world effectiveness is scarce, and radiologic response has not been reported previously. This study evaluated clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with perianal Crohn’s disease treated with upadacitinib. Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, adults with active perianal Crohn’s disease treated with upadacitinib across 10 North American centers were included. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as a ≥3-point reduction in the Perianal Disease Activity Index. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission (Perianal Disease Activity Index ≤4 and ≥3-point decrease or no worsening), ≥50% C-reactive protein reduction, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging outcomes (per TOpClass criteria), and rates of hospitalization, antibiotic use, and perianal Crohn’s disease–related surgery. Subgroup and Cox regression analyses assessed the effect of perianal Crohn’s disease duration, Montreal classification, prior biologic and anti–tumor necrosis factor exposure. Results Among 125 patients (56% male, median age 33 years), 48% had complex fistulas and 77.4% had prior anti–tumor necrosis factor exposure. At follow-up, 45.5% achieved clinical response, 39.4% clinical remission, 5.1% were hospitalized, and 13.1% underwent perianal surgery. On pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (n = 78), 55.1% improved and 11.5% completely healed. Clinical response was higher in anti–tumor necrosis factor-naïve patients with perianal Crohn’s disease (66.7% vs 33.3%; P = .001) and those with shorter disease duration (54.7% vs 33.3%; P = .04). Prior anti–tumor necrosis factor exposure predicted lower clinical response (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.66; P < .001). Conclusions Treatment with upadacitinib was associated with improved fistula outcomes in patients with perianal Crohn’s disease, with greater effectiveness in those anti–tumor necrosis factor-naïve or with shorter disease duration.
AB - Background & Aims A post-hoc analyses of phase III trials showed efficacy of upadacitinib in perianal Crohn’s disease, but real-world effectiveness is scarce, and radiologic response has not been reported previously. This study evaluated clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with perianal Crohn’s disease treated with upadacitinib. Methods In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, adults with active perianal Crohn’s disease treated with upadacitinib across 10 North American centers were included. The primary outcome was clinical response, defined as a ≥3-point reduction in the Perianal Disease Activity Index. Secondary outcomes included clinical remission (Perianal Disease Activity Index ≤4 and ≥3-point decrease or no worsening), ≥50% C-reactive protein reduction, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging outcomes (per TOpClass criteria), and rates of hospitalization, antibiotic use, and perianal Crohn’s disease–related surgery. Subgroup and Cox regression analyses assessed the effect of perianal Crohn’s disease duration, Montreal classification, prior biologic and anti–tumor necrosis factor exposure. Results Among 125 patients (56% male, median age 33 years), 48% had complex fistulas and 77.4% had prior anti–tumor necrosis factor exposure. At follow-up, 45.5% achieved clinical response, 39.4% clinical remission, 5.1% were hospitalized, and 13.1% underwent perianal surgery. On pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (n = 78), 55.1% improved and 11.5% completely healed. Clinical response was higher in anti–tumor necrosis factor-naïve patients with perianal Crohn’s disease (66.7% vs 33.3%; P = .001) and those with shorter disease duration (54.7% vs 33.3%; P = .04). Prior anti–tumor necrosis factor exposure predicted lower clinical response (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.66; P < .001). Conclusions Treatment with upadacitinib was associated with improved fistula outcomes in patients with perianal Crohn’s disease, with greater effectiveness in those anti–tumor necrosis factor-naïve or with shorter disease duration.
KW - Fistula Healing
KW - Perianal Crohn’s Disease
KW - Real-World Effectiveness
KW - Upadacitinib
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105043153625
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2026.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 42142719
AN - SCOPUS:105043153625
SN - 1542-3565
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ER -