Reliability of urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin as a biomarker in breast cancer

M. Barba, A. Cavalleri, H. J. Schünemann, V. Krogh, A. Evangelista, G. Secreto, A. Micheli, Q. Zhou, B. Fuhrman, B. Teter, F. Berrino, Paola Muti*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of cryopreservation at different storage temperatures on urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s) concentration. Overnight urine from 28 postmenopausal women participating in the ORDET cohort study was filtered and separated into 6 mL aliquots. Urine samples were stored at -80°C and at -30°C for an average of 14 years. Urinary aMT6s concentration was assessed using a competitive immunoassay. Mean aMT6s values of samples stored at -30°C were systematically lower than those of samples stored at -80°C (10.7 ng/mL versus 15.8 ng/mL, p<0.001). Bland Altman plots showed disagreement between determinations at different storage temperatures at the highest levels of the metabolite concentration. The degree of agreement evaluated in terms of intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.68 (95% CI 0.41-0.84, p<0.0001). Pearson's correlation coefficient between aMT6s values of the two differently stored samples was 0.93 (p<0.001), while the Kendal tau coefficient for rank distribution was 0.73 (p<0.001). Our data suggest that storage temperatures might affect degradation of aMT6s during storage. However, individual characterization by melatonin levels does not seem to be affected by cryopreservation conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-245
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Biological Markers
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • 6-Sulfatoxymelatonin
  • Biomarker
  • Breast cancer
  • Cryopreservation
  • Storage temperature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin as a biomarker in breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this