Routine computed tomography after recent operative exploration for penetrating trauma: What injuries do we miss?

April E. Mendoza*, Christopher A. Wybourn, Anthony G. Charles, Andre R. Campbell, Bruce A. Cairns, Margaret M. Knudson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patients with penetrating trauma who cannot be stabilized undergo operative intervention without preoperative imaging. In such cases, postoperative imaging may reveal additional injuries not identified during the initial operative exploration. The purpose of this study is to explore the utility of postoperative CT imaging in the setting of penetrating trauma. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of patients with penetrating trauma treated at an urban Level 1 trauma center between 2010 and 2015. Patients were included if they underwent an emergent laparotomy without preoperative imaging. Patients were excluded if they had prior imaging or concomitant blunt injury. For the purposes of this study, occult injury was defined as a CT scan finding not mentioned in the first operative report. Descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics who had received imaging immediately postoperatively with those who had not. RESULTS During the 5-year study period, 328 patients who had a laparotomy for penetrating trauma over the study period, 225 patients met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-three (32%) patients underwent CT scanning immediately postoperatively with occult injuries identified in 38 (52%) patients. The most frequent occult injuries were orthopedic (20 of 43) and genitourinary (9 of 43). Importantly, 10 (26%) of the 38 patients required an intervention for these occult injuries. Those selected for immediate postoperative imaging were more likely to have sustained gunshot wounds and were significantly more severely injured (higher Injury Severity Score and longer length of hospital stay) when compared to patients who did not receive immediate imaging. CONCLUSION We recommend the use of immediate postoperative CT after emergent laparotomy especially when there is a high index of suspicion for spine or genitourinary injuries and in patients who have sustained ballistic penetrating injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, level IV; diagnostic tests or criteria, level IV.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-578
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume83
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CT imaging
  • Occult injury
  • penetrating trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Routine computed tomography after recent operative exploration for penetrating trauma: What injuries do we miss?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this