TY - JOUR
T1 - Routine preoperative restaging CTs after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer are low yield
T2 - A retrospective case study
AU - Davids, Jennifer S.
AU - Alavi, Karim
AU - Andres Cervera-Servin, J.
AU - Choi, Christine S.
AU - Sturrock, Paul R.
AU - Sweeney, W. Brian
AU - Maykel, Justin A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Introduction: Pre-operative restaging CT scans are often performed routinely following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. There is a paucity of data on the utility of this common practice. We sought to determine how often restaging CTs identified disease progression or regression that altered management. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective study. From 2007 to 2011, 182 patients had newly-diagnosed, non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma, of which 96 were surgical candidates with clinical stage II/III disease. Ninety-one of these patients (95%) completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Results: Eighty-three out of 91 patients (91%) had restaging CTs. Four patients (5%) had new lesions suspicious for distant metastasis (2 lung, 2 liver) on restaging CT scan reports (1 of these was present on initial staging CT but not reported). All 4 patients had node-positive disease. In no case did restaging CT result in a change in surgical management. Discussion: Because of the financial costs and established risks of intravenous contrast and cumulative radiation exposure, it may be advisable to take a more selective approach to preoperative imaging. Larger, prospective studies may enable identification of an at-risk cohort who would benefit most from restaging CT. Conclusion: Routine restaging CT scans are low yield in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.
AB - Introduction: Pre-operative restaging CT scans are often performed routinely following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. There is a paucity of data on the utility of this common practice. We sought to determine how often restaging CTs identified disease progression or regression that altered management. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective study. From 2007 to 2011, 182 patients had newly-diagnosed, non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma, of which 96 were surgical candidates with clinical stage II/III disease. Ninety-one of these patients (95%) completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Results: Eighty-three out of 91 patients (91%) had restaging CTs. Four patients (5%) had new lesions suspicious for distant metastasis (2 lung, 2 liver) on restaging CT scan reports (1 of these was present on initial staging CT but not reported). All 4 patients had node-positive disease. In no case did restaging CT result in a change in surgical management. Discussion: Because of the financial costs and established risks of intravenous contrast and cumulative radiation exposure, it may be advisable to take a more selective approach to preoperative imaging. Larger, prospective studies may enable identification of an at-risk cohort who would benefit most from restaging CT. Conclusion: Routine restaging CT scans are low yield in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer.
KW - CT scan
KW - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
KW - Rectal cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918826101&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.033
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.10.033
M3 - Article
C2 - 25448648
AN - SCOPUS:84918826101
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 12
SP - 1295
EP - 1299
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
IS - 12
ER -