Abstract
Costimulation blockade (CoB) via belatacept is a lower-morbidity alternative to calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. However, it has higher rates of early acute rejection. These early rejections are mediated in part by memory T cells, which have reduced dependence on the pathway targeted by belatacept and increased adhesion molecule expression. One such molecule is leukocyte function antigen (LFA)-1. LFA-1 exists in two forms: a commonly expressed, low-affinity form and a transient, high-affinity form, expressed only during activation. We have shown that antibodies reactive with LFA-1 regardless of its configuration are effective in eliminating memory T cells but at the cost of impaired protective immunity. Here we test two novel agents, leukotoxin A and AL-579, each of which targets the high-affinity form of LFA-1, to determine whether this more precise targeting prevents belatacept-resistant rejection. Despite evidence of ex vivo and in vivo ligand-specific activity, neither agent when combined with belatacept proved superior to belatacept monotherapy. Leukotoxin A approached a ceiling of toxicity before efficacy, while AL-579 failed to significantly alter the peripheral immune response. These data, and prior studies, suggest that LFA-1 blockade may not be a suitable adjuvant agent for CoB-resistant rejection.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1193-1203 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | American Journal of Transplantation |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- animal models: nonhuman primate
- costimulation
- fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies: belatacept
- immunobiology
- immunosuppressant
- immunosuppression/immune modulation
- lymphocyte biology: trafficking
- macrophage/monocyte biology: activation
- translational research/science