TY - JOUR
T1 - Situated learning theory in health professions education research
T2 - a scoping review
AU - O’Brien, Bridget C.
AU - Battista, Alexis
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - At a time when cognitive and behavioral theories dominated the landscape of learning theories, Lave and Wenger’s situated learning theory (SLT) opened new territory by illuminating social and cultural learning processes. Many researchers and educators in the health professions embraced this theory, but few have considered how SLT has been used and what has been learned or improved through its use in health professions education (HPE). In this scoping review, the authors examine these questions and consider opportunities for future work with SLT in HPE. The authors followed Levac’s modified scoping review framework. They conducted a search of CINAHL, ERIC, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles referencing SLT or related concepts in HPE between 2006 and 2016. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, then screened full text for inclusion based on substantive treatment of SLT. Two authors extracted, analyzed and synthesized data from the final set of 193 articles. The authors identified two patterns of theory use. One sought an understanding of social learning processes in a specific context. The other aimed to design and/or evaluate interventions associated with communities of practice. These patterns are similar to other literatures (e.g., general education, healthcare, and organizational development) and, according to Lave and Wenger, may reflect confusion about the purpose, stance, and terminology of SLT. The authors discuss their findings in relation to primary source literature and consider opportunities for HPE researchers to employ and contribute to SLT going forward.
AB - At a time when cognitive and behavioral theories dominated the landscape of learning theories, Lave and Wenger’s situated learning theory (SLT) opened new territory by illuminating social and cultural learning processes. Many researchers and educators in the health professions embraced this theory, but few have considered how SLT has been used and what has been learned or improved through its use in health professions education (HPE). In this scoping review, the authors examine these questions and consider opportunities for future work with SLT in HPE. The authors followed Levac’s modified scoping review framework. They conducted a search of CINAHL, ERIC, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles referencing SLT or related concepts in HPE between 2006 and 2016. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts, then screened full text for inclusion based on substantive treatment of SLT. Two authors extracted, analyzed and synthesized data from the final set of 193 articles. The authors identified two patterns of theory use. One sought an understanding of social learning processes in a specific context. The other aimed to design and/or evaluate interventions associated with communities of practice. These patterns are similar to other literatures (e.g., general education, healthcare, and organizational development) and, according to Lave and Wenger, may reflect confusion about the purpose, stance, and terminology of SLT. The authors discuss their findings in relation to primary source literature and consider opportunities for HPE researchers to employ and contribute to SLT going forward.
KW - Communities of practice
KW - Health professions education
KW - Identity
KW - Legitimate peripheral participation
KW - Scoping review
KW - Situated learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068157790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
DO - 10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31230163
AN - SCOPUS:85068157790
SN - 1382-4996
VL - 25
SP - 483
EP - 509
JO - Advances in Health Sciences Education
JF - Advances in Health Sciences Education
IS - 2
ER -