TY - JOUR
T1 - Students’ interaction anxiety and social phobia in interprofessional education in Hong Kong
T2 - mapping a new research direction
AU - Ganotice, Fraide A.
AU - Shen, Xiaoai
AU - Yuen, Jacqueline Kwan Yuk
AU - Chow, Yin Man Amy
AU - Wong, Anita M.Y.
AU - Chan, Karen M.K.
AU - Zheng, Binbin
AU - Chan, Linda
AU - Ng, Pauline Yeung
AU - Leung, Siu Chung
AU - Barrett, Elizabeth
AU - Chan, Hoi Yan Celia
AU - Chan, Wing Nga
AU - Chan, Kit Wa Sherry
AU - Chan, Siu Ling Polly
AU - Chan, So Ching Sarah
AU - Chan, Esther W.Y.
AU - Cheuk, Yuet Ying Jessica
AU - Choy, Jacky
AU - He, Qing
AU - Jen, Julienne
AU - Jin, Jingwen
AU - Khoo, Ui Soon
AU - Lam, Ho Yan Angie
AU - Lam, May P.S.
AU - Law, Yik Wa
AU - Lee, Jetty Chung Yung
AU - Leung, Feona Chung Yin
AU - Leung, Ann
AU - Liu, Rebecca K.W.
AU - Lou, Vivian Wei Qun
AU - Luk, Pauline
AU - Ng, Zoe Lai Han
AU - Ng, Alina Yee Man
AU - Pun, Maggie Wai Ming
AU - See, Mary Lok Man
AU - Shen, Jiangang
AU - Szeto, Grace Pui Yuk
AU - Tam, Eliza Y.T.
AU - Tso, Winnie Wan Yee
AU - Wang, Ning
AU - Wang, Runjia
AU - Wong, Janet Kit Ting
AU - Wong, Janet Yuen Ha
AU - Yuen, Grace Wai Yee
AU - Tipoe, George Lim
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) has been promoted as a breakthrough in healthcare because of the impact when professionals work as a team. However, despite its inception dating back to the 1960s, its science has taken a long time to advance. There is a need to theorize IPE to cultivate creative insights for a nuanced understanding of IPE. This study aims to propose a research agenda on social interaction by understanding the measurement scales used and guiding researchers to contribute to the discussion of social processes in IPE. Method: This quantitative research was undertaken in a cross-institutional IPE involving 925 healthcare students (Medicine, Nursing, Social Work, Chinese Medicine, Pharmacy, Speech Language Pathology, Clinical Psychology, Food and Nutritional Science and Physiotherapy) from two institutions in Hong Kong. Participants completed the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6). We applied a construct validation approach: within-network and between-network validation. We performed confirmatory factors analysis, t-test, analysis of variance and regression analysis. Results: CFA results indicated that current data fit the a priori model providing support to within-network validity [RMSEA=.08, NFI=.959, CFI=.965, IFI=.965, TLI=.955]. The criteria for acceptable fit were met. The scales were invariant between genders, across year levels and disciplines. Results indicated that social interaction anxiety and social phobia negatively predicted behavioural engagement (F = 25.093, p<.001, R 2=.065) and positively predicted behavioural disaffection (F = 22.169, p<.001, R 2=.057) to IPE, suggesting between-network validity. Conclusions: Our data provided support for the validity of the scales when used among healthcare students in Hong Kong. SIAS-6 and SPS-6 have sound psychometric properties based on students’ data in Hong Kong. We identified quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research designs to guide researchers in getting involved in the discussion of students’ social interactions in IPE.Key Messages The Social Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6) scales have sound psychometric properties based on the large-scale healthcare students’ data in IPE in Hong Kong. Social interaction anxiety and social phobia negatively predicted students’ behavioural engagement with IPE and positively predicted behavioural disaffection. The scales are invariant in terms of gender, year level and discipline. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are proposed to aid researchers to contribute in healthcare education literature using the SIAS-6 and SPS-6.
AB - Background: Interprofessional education (IPE) has been promoted as a breakthrough in healthcare because of the impact when professionals work as a team. However, despite its inception dating back to the 1960s, its science has taken a long time to advance. There is a need to theorize IPE to cultivate creative insights for a nuanced understanding of IPE. This study aims to propose a research agenda on social interaction by understanding the measurement scales used and guiding researchers to contribute to the discussion of social processes in IPE. Method: This quantitative research was undertaken in a cross-institutional IPE involving 925 healthcare students (Medicine, Nursing, Social Work, Chinese Medicine, Pharmacy, Speech Language Pathology, Clinical Psychology, Food and Nutritional Science and Physiotherapy) from two institutions in Hong Kong. Participants completed the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6). We applied a construct validation approach: within-network and between-network validation. We performed confirmatory factors analysis, t-test, analysis of variance and regression analysis. Results: CFA results indicated that current data fit the a priori model providing support to within-network validity [RMSEA=.08, NFI=.959, CFI=.965, IFI=.965, TLI=.955]. The criteria for acceptable fit were met. The scales were invariant between genders, across year levels and disciplines. Results indicated that social interaction anxiety and social phobia negatively predicted behavioural engagement (F = 25.093, p<.001, R 2=.065) and positively predicted behavioural disaffection (F = 22.169, p<.001, R 2=.057) to IPE, suggesting between-network validity. Conclusions: Our data provided support for the validity of the scales when used among healthcare students in Hong Kong. SIAS-6 and SPS-6 have sound psychometric properties based on students’ data in Hong Kong. We identified quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research designs to guide researchers in getting involved in the discussion of students’ social interactions in IPE.Key Messages The Social Anxiety Scale (SIAS-6) and Social Phobia Scale (SPS-6) scales have sound psychometric properties based on the large-scale healthcare students’ data in IPE in Hong Kong. Social interaction anxiety and social phobia negatively predicted students’ behavioural engagement with IPE and positively predicted behavioural disaffection. The scales are invariant in terms of gender, year level and discipline. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are proposed to aid researchers to contribute in healthcare education literature using the SIAS-6 and SPS-6.
KW - Construct validation
KW - interprofessional education
KW - social interaction anxiety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159156015&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07853890.2023.2210842
DO - 10.1080/07853890.2023.2210842
M3 - Article
C2 - 37166406
AN - SCOPUS:85159156015
SN - 0785-3890
VL - 55
JO - Annals of Medicine
JF - Annals of Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 2210842
ER -