TY - JOUR
T1 - Targeted Ablation Using Ultrasound-Guided Irreversible Electroporation of Index Tumors (TARGET Study)
T2 - Prospective Development Study Evaluating Safety, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Oncologic Efficacy
AU - Fainberg, Jonathan
AU - Lee, Taehyoung
AU - Vertosick, Emily A.
AU - Sivaraman, Arjun
AU - Chesnut, Gregory
AU - Fine, Samson W.
AU - Eastham, James
AU - Coleman, Jonathan
AU - Ehdaie, Behfar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, INC.
PY - 2024/11/1
Y1 - 2024/11/1
N2 - Introduction: We studied patient-reported functional outcomes, safety, and oncologic efficacy of focal irreversible electroporation as a primary treatment for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Between February 2015 and April 2017, 20 consecutive patients elected irreversible electroporation and underwent 22 treatments. All underwent MRI-targeted and systematic transrectal biopsies. Eligibility criteria were grade group 2/3 prostate cancer in a maximum of 2 adjacent sextant prostate sectors in 1 hemigland without extraprostatic extension on MRI. Ablation was performed with a 5-mm cancer margin. Any grade group 1 cancer outside mapped index lesion was untreated. Outcome measures were based on the Prostate Quality of Life Survey, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire, and MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies at 3 and 12 months. Results: Nineteen patients completed irreversible electroporation. One had electrocardiographic changes, and irreversible electroporation was aborted. No deterioration was detected in urinary or sexual domains (-0.2, 95% CI -1.4, 0.9, P ¼ .7, and -1.9, 95% CI -10.1, 6.4, P ¼ .6, respectively) or health-related quality of life (-0.2, 95% CI -1.4, 1.0, P ¼ .7) at 6 months post ablation. Ejaculation volume decreased at 12 months (-1.5 points, 95% CI -2.4, -0.5, P ¼ .003). At 12 months of follow-up, 14/19 patients (74%, 95% CI 49%, 91%) had no clinically significant cancer anywhere in the prostate. Radical treatmentefree survival was 79% at 2 years (95% CI 53%, 92%) and 73% at 4 years (95% CI 47%, 88%). Conclusions: Our data show promising oncologic and functional outcomes following focal irreversible electroporation treatment for carefully selected patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Further research should compare irreversible electroporation with active surveillance.
AB - Introduction: We studied patient-reported functional outcomes, safety, and oncologic efficacy of focal irreversible electroporation as a primary treatment for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Between February 2015 and April 2017, 20 consecutive patients elected irreversible electroporation and underwent 22 treatments. All underwent MRI-targeted and systematic transrectal biopsies. Eligibility criteria were grade group 2/3 prostate cancer in a maximum of 2 adjacent sextant prostate sectors in 1 hemigland without extraprostatic extension on MRI. Ablation was performed with a 5-mm cancer margin. Any grade group 1 cancer outside mapped index lesion was untreated. Outcome measures were based on the Prostate Quality of Life Survey, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire, and MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies at 3 and 12 months. Results: Nineteen patients completed irreversible electroporation. One had electrocardiographic changes, and irreversible electroporation was aborted. No deterioration was detected in urinary or sexual domains (-0.2, 95% CI -1.4, 0.9, P ¼ .7, and -1.9, 95% CI -10.1, 6.4, P ¼ .6, respectively) or health-related quality of life (-0.2, 95% CI -1.4, 1.0, P ¼ .7) at 6 months post ablation. Ejaculation volume decreased at 12 months (-1.5 points, 95% CI -2.4, -0.5, P ¼ .003). At 12 months of follow-up, 14/19 patients (74%, 95% CI 49%, 91%) had no clinically significant cancer anywhere in the prostate. Radical treatmentefree survival was 79% at 2 years (95% CI 53%, 92%) and 73% at 4 years (95% CI 47%, 88%). Conclusions: Our data show promising oncologic and functional outcomes following focal irreversible electroporation treatment for carefully selected patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Further research should compare irreversible electroporation with active surveillance.
KW - ablation techniques
KW - focal therapy
KW - irreversible electroporation
KW - prostatic neoplasm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207952127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000666
DO - 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000666
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85207952127
SN - 2352-0779
VL - 11
SP - 983
EP - 990
JO - Urology Practice
JF - Urology Practice
IS - 6
ER -