TY - JOUR
T1 - Teaching metacognition in clinical decision-making using a novel mnemonic checklist
T2 - An exploratory study
AU - Chew, Keng Sheng
AU - Durning, Steven J.
AU - Van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Singapore Medical Association. All right reserved.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - INTRODUCTION Metacognition is a cognitive debiasing strategy that clinicians can use to deliberately detach themselves from the immediate context of a clinical decision, which allows them to refl ect upon the thinking process. However, cognitive debiasing strategies are often most needed when the clinician cannot afford the time to use them. A mnemonic checklist known as TWED (T = threat, W = what else, E = evidence and D = dispositional factors) was recently created to facilitate metacognition. This study explores the hypothesis that the TWED checklist improves the ability of medical students to make better clinical decisions. METHODS Two groups of fi nal-year medical students from Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, were recruited to participate in this quasi-experimental study. The intervention group (n = 21) received educational intervention that introduced the TWED checklist, while the control group (n = 19) received a tutorial on basic electrocardiography. Post-intervention, both groups received a similar assessment on clinical decision-making based on fi ve case scenarios. RESULTS The mean score of the intervention group was signifi cantly higher than that of the control group (18.50 ± 4.45 marks vs. 12.50 ± 2.84 marks, p < 0.001). In three of the fi ve case scenarios, students in the intervention group obtained higher scores than those in the control group. CONCLUSION The results of this study support the use of the TWED checklist to facilitate metacognition in clinical decision-making.
AB - INTRODUCTION Metacognition is a cognitive debiasing strategy that clinicians can use to deliberately detach themselves from the immediate context of a clinical decision, which allows them to refl ect upon the thinking process. However, cognitive debiasing strategies are often most needed when the clinician cannot afford the time to use them. A mnemonic checklist known as TWED (T = threat, W = what else, E = evidence and D = dispositional factors) was recently created to facilitate metacognition. This study explores the hypothesis that the TWED checklist improves the ability of medical students to make better clinical decisions. METHODS Two groups of fi nal-year medical students from Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, were recruited to participate in this quasi-experimental study. The intervention group (n = 21) received educational intervention that introduced the TWED checklist, while the control group (n = 19) received a tutorial on basic electrocardiography. Post-intervention, both groups received a similar assessment on clinical decision-making based on fi ve case scenarios. RESULTS The mean score of the intervention group was signifi cantly higher than that of the control group (18.50 ± 4.45 marks vs. 12.50 ± 2.84 marks, p < 0.001). In three of the fi ve case scenarios, students in the intervention group obtained higher scores than those in the control group. CONCLUSION The results of this study support the use of the TWED checklist to facilitate metacognition in clinical decision-making.
KW - Checklist
KW - Cognitive bias
KW - Cognitive debiasing strategy
KW - Medical education
KW - Metacognition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007061953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11622/smedj.2016015
DO - 10.11622/smedj.2016015
M3 - Article
C2 - 26778635
AN - SCOPUS:85007061953
SN - 0037-5675
VL - 57
SP - 694
EP - 700
JO - Singapore Medical Journal
JF - Singapore Medical Journal
IS - 12
ER -