TY - JOUR
T1 - Test-Retest Reliability of Concussion Baseline Assessments in United States Service Academy Cadets
T2 - A Report from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)-Department of Defense (DoD) CARE Consortium
AU - Houston, Megan N.
AU - Van Pelt, Kathryn L.
AU - D'Lauro, Christopher
AU - Brodeur, Rachel M.
AU - Campbell, Darren E.
AU - McGinty, Gerald T.
AU - Jackson, Jonathan C.
AU - Kelly, Tim F.
AU - Peck, Karen Y.
AU - Svoboda, Steven J.
AU - McAllister, Thomas W.
AU - McCrea, Michael A.
AU - Broglio, Steven P.
AU - Cameron, Kenneth L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Bonnie Campbell, Lisa Campbell, Megan Jackson, Jennifer Miley, Joel Robb, and Kim Robb (United States Air Force Academy), Robin Miller and Jarrett Headley (United States Coast Guard Academy), Stephanie Carminati, Steven Malvasi, Story Miraldi, Jamie Reilly, Sean Roach, and Jesse Trump (United States Military Academy) for data acquisition, as well as, the research and medical staff that assisted with baseline data collection at each of the service academy sites. The authors would also like to thank Jaroslaw Harezlak, Jody Harland, Janetta Matesan, Larry Riggen (Indiana University), Ashley Rettmann, Nicole L’Heureux (University of Michigan), Melissa Koschnitzke (Medical College of Wisconsin), Michael Jarrett, Vibeke Brinck, and Bianca Byrne (Quesgen), Thomas Dompier, Erin B. Wasserman, Melissa Niceley Baker, and Sara Quetant (Datalys Center for Sports Injury Research and Prevention). This publication was made possible, in part, with support from the Grand Alliance Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education Consortium, funded by the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the Department of Defense. The U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702-5014, USA is the awarding and administering acquisition office. This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Program under Award no. W81XWH-14-2-0151. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense (Defense Health Program funds).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2020.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Objective: In response to advancing clinical practice guidelines regarding concussion management, service members, like athletes, complete a baseline assessment prior to participating in high-risk activities. While several studies have established test stability in athletes, no investigation to date has examined the stability of baseline assessment scores in military cadets. The objective of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of a baseline concussion test battery in cadets at U.S. Service Academies. Methods: All cadets participating in the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium investigation completed a standard baseline battery that included memory, balance, symptom, and neurocognitive assessments. Annual baseline testing was completed during the first 3 years of the study. A two-way mixed-model analysis of variance (intraclass correlation coefficent (ICC)3,1) and Kappa statistics were used to assess the stability of the metrics at 1-year and 2-year time intervals. Results: ICC values for the 1-year test interval ranged from 0.28 to 0.67 and from 0.15 to 0.57 for the 2-year interval. Kappa values ranged from 0.16 to 0.21 for the 1-year interval and from 0.29 to 0.31 for the 2-year test interval. Across all measures, the observed effects were small, ranging from 0.01 to 0.44. Conclusions: This investigation noted less than optimal reliability for the most common concussion baseline assessments. While none of the assessments met or exceeded the accepted clinical threshold, the effect sizes were relatively small suggesting an overlap in performance from year-To-year. As such, baseline assessments beyond the initial evaluation in cadets are not essential but could aid concussion diagnosis.
AB - Objective: In response to advancing clinical practice guidelines regarding concussion management, service members, like athletes, complete a baseline assessment prior to participating in high-risk activities. While several studies have established test stability in athletes, no investigation to date has examined the stability of baseline assessment scores in military cadets. The objective of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of a baseline concussion test battery in cadets at U.S. Service Academies. Methods: All cadets participating in the Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) Consortium investigation completed a standard baseline battery that included memory, balance, symptom, and neurocognitive assessments. Annual baseline testing was completed during the first 3 years of the study. A two-way mixed-model analysis of variance (intraclass correlation coefficent (ICC)3,1) and Kappa statistics were used to assess the stability of the metrics at 1-year and 2-year time intervals. Results: ICC values for the 1-year test interval ranged from 0.28 to 0.67 and from 0.15 to 0.57 for the 2-year interval. Kappa values ranged from 0.16 to 0.21 for the 1-year interval and from 0.29 to 0.31 for the 2-year test interval. Across all measures, the observed effects were small, ranging from 0.01 to 0.44. Conclusions: This investigation noted less than optimal reliability for the most common concussion baseline assessments. While none of the assessments met or exceeded the accepted clinical threshold, the effect sizes were relatively small suggesting an overlap in performance from year-To-year. As such, baseline assessments beyond the initial evaluation in cadets are not essential but could aid concussion diagnosis.
KW - Balance
KW - Change score
KW - Mild traumatic brain injury
KW - Neurocognitive
KW - Neuropsychological tests
KW - Symptoms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087057340&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S1355617720000594
DO - 10.1017/S1355617720000594
M3 - Article
C2 - 32539884
AN - SCOPUS:85087057340
SN - 1355-6177
VL - 27
SP - 23
EP - 34
JO - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
JF - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
IS - 1
ER -