TY - JOUR
T1 - The art of bedside rounds
T2 - A multi-center qualitative study of strategies used by experienced bedside teachers
AU - Gonzalo, Jed D.
AU - Heist, Brian S.
AU - Duffy, Briar L.
AU - Dyrbye, Liselotte
AU - Fagan, Mark J.
AU - Ferenchick, Gary
AU - Harrell, Heather
AU - Hemmer, Paul A.
AU - Kernan, Walter N.
AU - Kogan, Jennifer R.
AU - Rafferty, Colleen
AU - Wong, Raymond
AU - Elnicki, D. Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This study was funded by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center’s Shadyside Thomas H. Nimick, Jr. Research Fund and the Shadyside Hospital Foundation.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Medical educators believe bedside rounds are effective for the delivery of patient-centered care, and are necessary in helping trainees acquire competence in clinical care. Although recommendations for bedside rounds have been reported, a recent, systematic assessment of strategies used by current-day bedside teachers was needed to advance knowledge of this teaching method. OBJECTIVE: To identify and understand bedside teachers' 1) preparatory steps, 2) patient selection, and 3) role allocation during the process of bedside rounds. DESIGN: A qualitative inductive thematic analysis using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine physicians (n = 34) who perform bedside rounds from ten academic US institutions (2010-2011). APPROACH: A purposive sampling strategy was utilized to identify physicians who were active inpatient attending physicians and met specific inclusion criteria for "bedside rounds." A total of 34 interviews were completed, and each was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis extracted key themes pertaining to the three objectives. KEY RESULTS: Most respondents (51 %) were associate or full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. Attending physicians prepared using trainee-specific, patient-specific and disease-specific information, while also mentally preparing for bedside rounds. They sought trainee buy-in and learning objectives, reviewed expectations and methods to ensure patient comfort, and provided early guidance with bedside encounters. Patients were selected if they required immediate care, were new to the service, or had a high educational value, while patients were deferred if unavailable, unwilling, or unable to communicate. The team members' roles during bedside rounds varied, with trainees being given graduated autonomy with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside teachers' methods for preparation, patient selection, and role allocation during bedside rounds enhance trainees' education within the workplace. Strategies used by experienced bedside teachers can be used for faculty development efforts aimed at promoting this activity.
AB - BACKGROUND: Medical educators believe bedside rounds are effective for the delivery of patient-centered care, and are necessary in helping trainees acquire competence in clinical care. Although recommendations for bedside rounds have been reported, a recent, systematic assessment of strategies used by current-day bedside teachers was needed to advance knowledge of this teaching method. OBJECTIVE: To identify and understand bedside teachers' 1) preparatory steps, 2) patient selection, and 3) role allocation during the process of bedside rounds. DESIGN: A qualitative inductive thematic analysis using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine physicians (n = 34) who perform bedside rounds from ten academic US institutions (2010-2011). APPROACH: A purposive sampling strategy was utilized to identify physicians who were active inpatient attending physicians and met specific inclusion criteria for "bedside rounds." A total of 34 interviews were completed, and each was recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis extracted key themes pertaining to the three objectives. KEY RESULTS: Most respondents (51 %) were associate or full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. Attending physicians prepared using trainee-specific, patient-specific and disease-specific information, while also mentally preparing for bedside rounds. They sought trainee buy-in and learning objectives, reviewed expectations and methods to ensure patient comfort, and provided early guidance with bedside encounters. Patients were selected if they required immediate care, were new to the service, or had a high educational value, while patients were deferred if unavailable, unwilling, or unable to communicate. The team members' roles during bedside rounds varied, with trainees being given graduated autonomy with increased experience. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside teachers' methods for preparation, patient selection, and role allocation during bedside rounds enhance trainees' education within the workplace. Strategies used by experienced bedside teachers can be used for faculty development efforts aimed at promoting this activity.
KW - medical education
KW - medical education-faculty development
KW - medical education-qualitative methods
KW - patient-centered care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878856396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2
DO - 10.1007/s11606-012-2259-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 23129164
AN - SCOPUS:84878856396
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 28
SP - 412
EP - 420
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 3
ER -