TY - JOUR
T1 - The Association of Changing Practice Settings on Maintenance of Certification Exam Outcomes
T2 - A Comparative Study of General Internists over Time
AU - Jones, Andrew T.
AU - Barnhart, Brendan J.
AU - Durning, Steven J.
AU - Lipner, Rebecca S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the Association of American Medical Colleges. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
PY - 2018/5/1
Y1 - 2018/5/1
N2 - Purpose To investigate how changing to or from solo practice settings relates to maintenance of certification (MOC) exam performance. Method The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of exam pass/fail outcomes for 7,112 physicians who successfully completed their initial MOC cycle from 2000 to 2004. Initial physician MOC practice characteristics records, demographic information, and exam performance were linked with exam pass/fail outcomes from their second MOC cycle from 2006 to 2014 (5,215 physicians after attrition). Exam pass/fail outcomes for physicians' second MOC cycle were compared among four groups: those who remained in group practice across both MOC cycles, those who changed from group to solo practice, those who changed from solo to group practice, and those who remained in solo practice across both MOC cycles. Results Physicians who changed from solo to group practice performed significantly better than those who remained in solo practice (odds ratio [OR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 2.51; P =.027). Conversely, physicians changing from group to solo practice performed significantly worse than physicians staying in group practice (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.45, 0.80; P =.002). Meanwhile, physicians who changed from solo to group practice performed similarly to physicians remaining in group practice (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.67, 1.35; P = 0.76). Conclusions Changes in solo/group practice status were associated with second-cycle MOC exam performance. This study provides evidence that the context in which a physician practices may have an impact on their MOC exam performance.
AB - Purpose To investigate how changing to or from solo practice settings relates to maintenance of certification (MOC) exam performance. Method The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of exam pass/fail outcomes for 7,112 physicians who successfully completed their initial MOC cycle from 2000 to 2004. Initial physician MOC practice characteristics records, demographic information, and exam performance were linked with exam pass/fail outcomes from their second MOC cycle from 2006 to 2014 (5,215 physicians after attrition). Exam pass/fail outcomes for physicians' second MOC cycle were compared among four groups: those who remained in group practice across both MOC cycles, those who changed from group to solo practice, those who changed from solo to group practice, and those who remained in solo practice across both MOC cycles. Results Physicians who changed from solo to group practice performed significantly better than those who remained in solo practice (odds ratio [OR] = 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11, 2.51; P =.027). Conversely, physicians changing from group to solo practice performed significantly worse than physicians staying in group practice (OR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.45, 0.80; P =.002). Meanwhile, physicians who changed from solo to group practice performed similarly to physicians remaining in group practice (OR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.67, 1.35; P = 0.76). Conclusions Changes in solo/group practice status were associated with second-cycle MOC exam performance. This study provides evidence that the context in which a physician practices may have an impact on their MOC exam performance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053918747&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002028
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002028
M3 - Article
C2 - 29040158
AN - SCOPUS:85053918747
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 93
SP - 756
EP - 762
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 5
ER -