The association of regional perinatal risk factors and neonatal intensive care capacity for Military Health System-insured newborns

David C. Goodman*, Celeste J. Romano, Clinton Hall, Anna T. Bukowinski, Thornton S. Mu, Gia R. Gumbs, Ava Marie S. Conlin, Rasheda J. Vereen, Jo Anna K. Leyenaar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To characterize hospitals where military-insured newborns received care and test the association of regional perinatal risk with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) capacity. Study design: We identified birth hospitals for live newborns October 2015–December 2018 (n = 296,568) and assigned newborns to health service areas (HSAs). Perinatal risk factors and the number of neonatal special care beds and neonatologists were calculated at HSA levels. Cross-sectional correlation analyses assessed perinatal risk factors and capacity across HSAs. Results: 27.0% (n = 10) of military birth hospitals had special care beds (intermediate and intensive) compared with 44.3% of civilian hospitals (n = 1224; p < 0.05). The number of special care beds and neonatologists per newborn varied more than twofold across regions and were only weakly associated with the proportion of higher risk newborns (R2 < 0.05). Conclusions: The lack of meaningful association of regional perinatal risk with NICU capacity poses challenges for effective specialized care among military-associated newborns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-795
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Perinatology
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Cite this