Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Blind Men, the Elephant, and the Continuing Education Course: Why Higher Standards Are Needed in Physical Therapist Professional Development

  • Seth Peterson*
  • , Mark Shepherd
  • , Joe Farrell
  • , Daniel I. Rhon
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

SYNOPSIS: Evidence-based practice and implementing clinical practice guidelines are familiar themes for musculoskeletal rehabilitation clinicians. Yet, many clinicians continue to eschew recommended treatments. One explanation could be that physical therapists largely rely on continuing education courses - not research reports or standardized postprofessional education - to learn new treatments and update their practice patterns. However, continuing education courses in physical therapy have a much less rigorous review process, and interventions taught in these courses often conflict with high-quality evidence. The lack of rigor in continuing education may contribute to unwarranted variability in practice, which is a major threat to physical therapy. The current continuing competence paradigm in the United States, of which continuing education is a part, needs an overhaul to ensure clinicians learn current best evidence. Now is the time for change in professional development. We offer 3 suggestions to improve the current system of continuing competence in physical therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)642-646
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy
Volume52
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • continuing education
  • fellowship
  • postprofessional
  • residency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Blind Men, the Elephant, and the Continuing Education Course: Why Higher Standards Are Needed in Physical Therapist Professional Development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this