Abstract
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young athletes is publicly remarkable and tragic because of the loss of a seemingly healthy young person. Because many of the potential etiologies may be identified with a preparticipation electrocardiogram (ECG), the possible use of an ECG as a screening tool has received much attention. A good screening test should be cost-effective and should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health. The reality is that the prevalence of SCD is low and no outcome-based data exist to determine whether early detection saves lives. Further, there is insufficient screening infrastructure, and the risk of screening and follow-up may be higher than that of the actual disease. Until outcomes data demonstrate a benefit with regard to SCD, universal screening cannot be recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-85 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Current Sports Medicine Reports |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Evidence Against Cardiac Screening Using Electrocardiogram in Athletes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver