TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of ultrasound in patients with possible penetrating cardiac wounds
T2 - A prospective multicenter study
AU - Rozycki, Grace S.
AU - Feliciano, David V.
AU - Ochsner, M. Gage
AU - Knudson, M. Margaret
AU - Hoyt, David B.
AU - Davis, Frank
AU - Hammerman, David
AU - Figueredo, Vincent
AU - Harviel, J. Duncan
AU - Han, David C.
AU - Schmidt, Judith A.
PY - 1999/4
Y1 - 1999/4
N2 - Background: Ultrasound is quickly becoming part of the trauma surgeon's practice, but its role in the patient with a penetrating truncal injury is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency ultrasound as it was introduced into five Level I trauma centers for the diagnosis of acute hemopericardium. Methods: Surgeons or cardiologists (four centers) and technicians (one center) performed pericardial ultrasound examinations on patients with penetrating truncal wounds. By protocol, patients with positive examinations underwent immediate operation. Vital signs, base deficit, time from examination to operation, operative findings, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Results: Pericardial ultrasound examinations were performed in 261 patients. There were 225 (86.2%) true-negative, 29 (11.1%) true-positive, 0 false-negative, and 7 (2.7%) false-positive examinations, resulting in sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96.9%, and accuracy of 97.3%. The mean time from ultrasound to operation was 12.1 ± 5 minutes. Conclusion: Ultrasound should be the initial modality for the evaluation of patients with penetrating precordial wounds because it is accurate and rapid.
AB - Background: Ultrasound is quickly becoming part of the trauma surgeon's practice, but its role in the patient with a penetrating truncal injury is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency ultrasound as it was introduced into five Level I trauma centers for the diagnosis of acute hemopericardium. Methods: Surgeons or cardiologists (four centers) and technicians (one center) performed pericardial ultrasound examinations on patients with penetrating truncal wounds. By protocol, patients with positive examinations underwent immediate operation. Vital signs, base deficit, time from examination to operation, operative findings, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Results: Pericardial ultrasound examinations were performed in 261 patients. There were 225 (86.2%) true-negative, 29 (11.1%) true-positive, 0 false-negative, and 7 (2.7%) false-positive examinations, resulting in sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 96.9%, and accuracy of 97.3%. The mean time from ultrasound to operation was 12.1 ± 5 minutes. Conclusion: Ultrasound should be the initial modality for the evaluation of patients with penetrating precordial wounds because it is accurate and rapid.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032940507&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00002
DO - 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00002
M3 - Article
C2 - 10217216
AN - SCOPUS:0032940507
SN - 0022-5282
VL - 46
SP - 543
EP - 552
JO - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
JF - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
IS - 4
ER -