Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The use of aortic balloon occlusion in traumatic shock: first report from the ABO trauma registry

  • M. Sadeghi
  • , K. F. Nilsson
  • , T. Larzon
  • , A. Pirouzram
  • , A. Toivola
  • , P. Skoog
  • , K. Idoguchi
  • , Y. Kon
  • , T. Ishida
  • , Y. Matsumara
  • , J. Matsumoto
  • , V. Reva
  • , M. Maszkowski
  • , A. Bersztel
  • , E. Caragounis
  • , M. Falkenberg
  • , L. Handolin
  • , B. Kessel
  • , D. Hebron
  • , F. Coccolini
  • L. Ansaloni, M. J. Madurska, J. J. Morrison, T. M. Hörer*
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a technique for temporary stabilization of patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage. This technique has been increasingly used worldwide during the past decade. Despite the good outcomes of translational studies, clinical studies are divided. The aim of this multicenter-international study was to capture REBOA-specific data and outcomes. Methods: REBOA practicing centers were invited to join this online register, which was established in September 2014. REBOA cases were reported, both retrospective and prospective. Demographics, injury patterns, hemodynamic variables, REBOA-specific data, complications and 30-days mortality were reported. Results: Ninety-six cases from 6 different countries were reported between 2011 and 2016. Mean age was 52 ± 22 years and 88% of the cases were blunt trauma with a median injury severity score (ISS) of 41 (IQR 29–50). In the majority of the cases, Zone I REBOA was used. Median systolic blood pressure before balloon inflation was 60 mmHg (IQR 40–80), which increased to 100 mmHg (IQR 80–128) after inflation. Continuous occlusion was applied in 52% of the patients, and 48% received non-continuous occlusion. Occlusion time longer than 60 min was reported as 38 and 14% in the non-continuous and continuous groups, respectively. Complications, such as extremity compartment syndrome (n = 3), were only noted in the continuous occlusion group. The 30-day mortality for non-continuous REBOA was 48%, and 64% for continuous occlusion. Conclusions: This observational multicenter study presents results regarding continuous and non-continuous REBOA with favorable outcomes. However, further prospective studies are needed to be able to draw conclusions on morbidity and mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-501
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2018

Keywords

  • Aortic occlusion
  • Hemorrhage
  • IABO
  • REBOA
  • Trauma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The use of aortic balloon occlusion in traumatic shock: first report from the ABO trauma registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this