Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Timing HIV infection with a simple and accurate population viral dynamics model

Daniel B. Reeves*, Morgane Rolland, Bethany L. Dearlove, Yifan Li, Merlin L. Robb, Joshua T. Schiffer, Peter Gilbert, E. Fabian Cardozo-Ojeda, Bryan T. Mayer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical trials for HIV prevention can require knowledge of infection times to subsequently determine protective drug levels. Yet, infection timing is difficult when study visits are sparse. Using population nonlinear mixed-effects (pNLME) statistical inference and viral loads from 46 RV217 study participants, we developed a relatively simple HIV primary infection model that achieved an excellent fit to all data. We also discovered that Aptima assay values from the study strongly correlated with viral loads, enabling imputation of very early viral loads for 28/46 participants. Estimated times between infecting exposures and first positives were generally longer than prior estimates (average of two weeks) and were robust to missing viral upslope data. On simulated data, we found that tighter sampling before diagnosis improved estimation more than tighter sampling after diagnosis. Sampling weekly before and monthly after diagnosis was a pragmatic design for good timing accuracy. Our pNLME timing approach is widely applicable to other infections with existing mathematical models. The present model could be used to simulate future HIV trials and may help estimate protective thresholds from the recently completed antibody-mediated prevention trials.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20210314
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume18
Issue number179
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2021

Keywords

  • clinical trials
  • HIV
  • infection timing
  • mathematical modelling
  • viral dynamics

Cite this