Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Treatment in a preventive cardiology clinic utilizing advanced practice providers effectively closes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk-management gaps among a primary-prevention population compared with a propensity-matched primary-care cohort: A team-based care model and its impact on lipid and blood pressure management

  • Emilio Fentanes
  • , Anthony G. Vande Hei
  • , R. Scott Holuby
  • , Norma Suarez
  • , Yousif Slim
  • , Jennifer N. Slim
  • , Ahmad M. Slim
  • , Dustin Thomas*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Advanced practice providers (APPs) can fill care gaps created by physician shortages and improve adherence/compliance with preventive ASCVD interventions. Hypothesis: APPs utilizing guideline-based algorithms will more frequently escalate ASCVD risk factor therapies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 595 patients enrolled in a preventive cardiology clinic (PCC) utilizing APPs compared with a propensity-matched cohort (PMC) of 595 patients enrolled in primary-care clinics alone. PCC patients were risk-stratified using Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). Results: Baseline demographics were balanced between the groups. CACS was more commonly obtained in PCC patients (P < 0.001), resulting in reclassification of 30.6% patients to a higher risk category, including statin therapy in 26.6% of low-FRS PCC patients with CACS ≥75th MESA percentile. Aspirin initiation was higher for high and intermediate FRS patients in the PCC (P < 0.001). Post-intervention mean LDL-C, non–HDL-C, and triglycerides (all P < 0.05) were lower in the PCC group. Compliance with appropriate lipid treatment was higher in intermediate to high FRS patients (P = 0.004) in the PCC group. Aggressive LDL-C and non–HDL-C treatment goals (<70 mg/dL, P = 0.005 and < 130 mg/dL, P < 0.001, respectively), were more commonly achieved in high-FRS PCC patients. Median post-intervention SBP was lower among intermediate and low FRS patients (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cumulatively, this resulted in a reduction in median post-intervention PCC FRS across all initial FRS risk categories (P < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: APPs within a PCC effectively risk-stratify and aggressively manage ASCVD risk factors, resulting in a reduction in post-intervention FRS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)817-824
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Atherosclerosis
  • Blood Pressure Control and Regulation
  • Computed Tomography
  • General Clinical Cardiology/Adult
  • Imaging
  • Preventive Cardiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment in a preventive cardiology clinic utilizing advanced practice providers effectively closes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk-management gaps among a primary-prevention population compared with a propensity-matched primary-care cohort: A team-based care model and its impact on lipid and blood pressure management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this