TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultraportable oxygen concentrator use in U.S. army special operations forward area surgery
T2 - A proof of concept in multiple environments
AU - Rybak, Michael
AU - Huffman, Lynn C.
AU - Nahouraii, Richard
AU - Loden, John
AU - Gonzalez, Marcos
AU - Wilson, Ramey
AU - Danielson, Paul D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - Introduction: A limitation to surgical care in an austere environment is the supply of oxygen to support mechanical ventilation and general anesthesia. Portable oxygen concentrators (OCs) offer an alternative to traditional compressed oxygen tanks. Objectives: We set out to demonstrate that a low-pressure OC system could supply the mechanical ventilation needs in an austere operating environment. Methods: An ultraportable OC (SAROS Model 3000, SeQual Technologies, Ball Ground, Georgia) was paired with an Impact 754 ventilator (Impact Instrumentation, West Caldwell, New Jersey) to evaluate the delivered fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to a test lung across a range of minute ventilations and at altitudes of 1,200 and 6,500 feet above sea level. Results: The compressor-driven Impact ventilator was able to deliver FiO2 at close to 0.9 for minute ventilations equal to oxygen flow. Pairing two OCs expanded the range of minute ventilations supported. OCs were less effective at concentrating oxygen at higher altitudes. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that low-pressure, ultraportable OCs are capable of delivering high FiO2 during mechanical ventilation in austere locations at both low and high altitudes. Ultraportable OCs could therefore be sufficient to support forward area surgical procedures and positively impact logistics.
AB - Introduction: A limitation to surgical care in an austere environment is the supply of oxygen to support mechanical ventilation and general anesthesia. Portable oxygen concentrators (OCs) offer an alternative to traditional compressed oxygen tanks. Objectives: We set out to demonstrate that a low-pressure OC system could supply the mechanical ventilation needs in an austere operating environment. Methods: An ultraportable OC (SAROS Model 3000, SeQual Technologies, Ball Ground, Georgia) was paired with an Impact 754 ventilator (Impact Instrumentation, West Caldwell, New Jersey) to evaluate the delivered fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to a test lung across a range of minute ventilations and at altitudes of 1,200 and 6,500 feet above sea level. Results: The compressor-driven Impact ventilator was able to deliver FiO2 at close to 0.9 for minute ventilations equal to oxygen flow. Pairing two OCs expanded the range of minute ventilations supported. OCs were less effective at concentrating oxygen at higher altitudes. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that low-pressure, ultraportable OCs are capable of delivering high FiO2 during mechanical ventilation in austere locations at both low and high altitudes. Ultraportable OCs could therefore be sufficient to support forward area surgical procedures and positively impact logistics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008929969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00100
DO - 10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00100
M3 - Article
C2 - 28051988
AN - SCOPUS:85008929969
SN - 0026-4075
VL - 182
SP - e1649-e1652
JO - Military Medicine
JF - Military Medicine
IS - 1
ER -