Abstract
Purpose of Review: The US Navy has a long history of responding to disasters around the globe. US Navy ships have unique characteristics and capabilities that determine their capacity for a disaster response. This paper discusses common considerations and lessons learned from three distinct disaster missions. Recent Findings: The 2010 earthquake in Haiti had a robust response with multiple US Navy ship platforms. It was best assessed in three phases: an initial mass casualty response, a subacute response, and a humanitarian response. The 2017 response to Hurricane Maria had a significant focus on treating patients with acute needs secondary to chronic illnesses to decrease the burden on the local healthcare system. The COVID-19 response brought distinctive challenges as it was the first mission where hospital ships were utilized in an infectious disease deployment. Summary: The first ships to respond to a disaster will need to focus on triage and acute traumatic injury. After this first phase, the ship’s medical assets will need to focus on providing care in a disrupted health care system which most often includes acute exacerbations of chronic disease. Surgeons must be ready to be flexible in their responsibilities, be competent with end-of-life care, and negotiate technical and cultural communication challenges.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 138-146 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Current Trauma Reports |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2022 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Disaster medicine
- Hospital ships
- Humanitarian surgery
- Military medicine
- Military ships
- Military surgery