TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of cross-reactive serological assays for detecting novel pathogens in wildlife
T2 - Assessing an appropriate cutoff for henipavirus assays in African bats
AU - Peel, Alison J.
AU - McKinley, Trevelyan J.
AU - Baker, Kate S.
AU - Barr, Jennifer A.
AU - Crameri, Gary
AU - Hayman, David T.S.
AU - Feng, Yan Ru
AU - Broder, Christopher C.
AU - Wang, Lin Fa
AU - Cunningham, Andrew A.
AU - Wood, James L.N.
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Reservoir hosts of novel pathogens are often identified or suspected as such on the basis of serological assay results, prior to the isolation of the pathogen itself. Serological assays might therefore be used outside of their original, validated scope in order to infer seroprevalences in reservoir host populations, until such time that specific diagnostic assays can be developed. This is particularly the case in wildlife disease research. The absence of positive and negative control samples and gold standard diagnostic assays presents challenges in determining an appropriate threshold, or 'cutoff', for the assay that enables differentiation between seronegative and seropositive individuals. Here, multiple methods were explored to determine an appropriate cutoff for a multiplexed microsphere assay that is used to detect henipavirus antibody binding in fruit bat plasma. These methods included calculating multiples of 'negative' control assay values, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, and Bayesian mixture models to assess the distribution of assay outputs for classifying seropositive and seronegative individuals within different age classes. As for any diagnostic assay, the most appropriate cutoff determination method and value selected must be made according to the aims of the study. This study is presented as an example for others where reference samples, and assays that have been characterised previously, are absent.
AB - Reservoir hosts of novel pathogens are often identified or suspected as such on the basis of serological assay results, prior to the isolation of the pathogen itself. Serological assays might therefore be used outside of their original, validated scope in order to infer seroprevalences in reservoir host populations, until such time that specific diagnostic assays can be developed. This is particularly the case in wildlife disease research. The absence of positive and negative control samples and gold standard diagnostic assays presents challenges in determining an appropriate threshold, or 'cutoff', for the assay that enables differentiation between seronegative and seropositive individuals. Here, multiple methods were explored to determine an appropriate cutoff for a multiplexed microsphere assay that is used to detect henipavirus antibody binding in fruit bat plasma. These methods included calculating multiples of 'negative' control assay values, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, and Bayesian mixture models to assess the distribution of assay outputs for classifying seropositive and seronegative individuals within different age classes. As for any diagnostic assay, the most appropriate cutoff determination method and value selected must be made according to the aims of the study. This study is presented as an example for others where reference samples, and assays that have been characterised previously, are absent.
KW - Eidolon helvum
KW - Emerging diseases
KW - Microsphere binding assay
KW - Multiplex
KW - Serology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880684869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.06.030
DO - 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.06.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 23835034
AN - SCOPUS:84880684869
SN - 0166-0934
VL - 193
SP - 295
EP - 303
JO - Journal of Virological Methods
JF - Journal of Virological Methods
IS - 2
ER -