Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Using classification trees to identify psychotherapy patients at risk for poor treatment adherence

Timothy Regan*, Morgan N. McCredie, Bethany Harris, Shaunna Clark

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the relative importance of a wide variety of personality and psychopathology variables in influencing patients’ adherence to psychotherapy treatment. Method: Two classification trees were trained to predict patients’ (1) treatment utilization (i.e., their likelihood of missing a given appointment) and (2) termination status (i.e., their likelihood of dropping out of therapy prematurely). Each tree was then validated in an external dataset to examine performance accuracy. Results: Patients’ social detachment was most influential in predicting their treatment utilization, followed by affective instability and activity/energy levels. Patients’ interpersonal warmth was most influential in predicting their termination status, followed by levels of disordered thought and resentment. The overall accuracy rating for the tree for termination status was 71.4%, while the tree for treatment utilization had a 38.7% accuracy rating. Conclusion: Classification trees are a practical tool for clinicians to determine patients at risk of premature termination. More research is needed to develop trees that predict treatment utilization with high accuracy across different types of patients and settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-170
Number of pages12
JournalPsychotherapy Research
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • attendance
  • classification trees
  • dropout
  • machine learning
  • psychotherapy

Cite this