Validation of the international medical prevention registry on venous thromboembolism bleeding risk score

David C. Hostler, Elizabeth S. Marx, Lisa K. Moores, Sarah K. Petteys, Jordanna Mae Hostler, Joshua D. Mitchell, Paul R. Holley, Jacob F. Collen, Brian E. Foster, Aaron B. Holley*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations


Background: Recent guidelines recommend assessing medical inpatients for bleeding risk prior to providing chemical prophylaxis for VTE. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) bleeding risk score (BRS) was derived from a well-defined population of medical inpatients but it has not been validated externally. We sought to externally validate the IMPROVE BRS. Methods: We prospectively collected characteristics on admission and VTE prophylaxis data each hospital day for all patients admitted for a medical illness to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center over an 18-month period. We calculated the IMPROVE BRS for each patient using admission data and reviewed medical records to identify bleeding events. Results: From September 2009 through March 2011, 1,668 inpatients met the IMPROVE inclusion criteria. Bleeding events occurred during 45 separate admissions (2.7%); 31 events (1.9%) were major and 14 (0.8%) were nonmajor but clinically relevant. Two hundred fiftysix patients (20.7%) had an IMPROVE BRS ≥ 7.0. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a higher cumulative incidence of major (P = .02) and clinically important (major plus clinically relevant nonmajor) (P = .06) bleeding within 14 days in patients with an IMPROVE BRS ≥ 7.0. An IMPROVE BRS ≥ 7.0 was associated with major bleeding in Cox-regression analysis adjusted for administration of chemical prophylaxis (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1-5.9; P = .03); there was a trend toward a significant association with clinically important bleeding (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.9-3.7; P = .07). Conclusions: The IMPROVE BRS calculated at admission predicts major bleeding in medical inpatients. This model may help assess the relative risks of bleeding and VTE before chemoprophylaxis is administered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-379
Number of pages8
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes


  • Antibiotic therapy
  • Deep venous thrombosis
  • Pulmonary embolism


Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the international medical prevention registry on venous thromboembolism bleeding risk score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this