What experimental approaches (eg, in vivo, in vitro, tissue retrieval) are effective in investigating the biologic effects of particles?

Mathias Bostrom, Regis O'Keefe, Thomas W. Bauer, Joan Bechtold, Patricia A. Campbell, Victor Goldberg, Stuart B. Goodman, Ed M. Greenfield, Joshua J. Jacobs, Yrjö Konttinen, Francis Young In Lee, Edward M. Schwarz, Arun S. Shanbhag, Robert Lane Smith, Rocky S. Tuan, J. Mark Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding the complex cellular and tissue mechanisms and interactions resulting in periprosthetic osteolysis requires a number of experimental approaches, each of which has its own set of advantages and limitations. In vitro models allow for the isolation of individual cell populations and have furthered our understanding of particle-cell interactions; however, they are limited because they do not mimic the complex tissue environment in which multiple cell interactions occur. In vivo animal models investigate the tissue interactions associated with periprosthetic osteolysis, but the choice of species and whether the implant system is subjected to mechanical load or to unloaded conditions are critical in assessing whether these models can be extrapolated to the clinical condition. Rigid analysis of retrieved tissue from clinical cases of osteolysis offers a different approach to studying the biologic process of osteolysis, but it is limited in that the tissue analyzed represents the end-stage of this process and, thus, may not reflect this process adequately.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S63-S67
JournalThe Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What experimental approaches (eg, in vivo, in vitro, tissue retrieval) are effective in investigating the biologic effects of particles?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this