Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When Should Providers Defer versus Impose Their Views?

Edmund G. Howe*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This piece discusses perhaps the most agonizing ethical decision ethics consultants and other providers encounter. This is the extent to which providers should defer decisions to patients or to their proxy decision makers as opposed to imposing their own views as to what they think is ethically right. It discusses the most difficult issues these providers may encounter, especially when they wish to depart from authoritative bodies’ standards or guidelines, and it presents initial steps providers may take to help patients and their families work together to resolve these dilemmas more harmoniously. It highlights how providers may inadvertently impose flawed biases on patients and families. Finally, it discusses how providers should take initiative with both parties to offer to help appeal when these avenues already exist and seek to establish the appellate procedures when they are absent.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-295
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Ethics
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Should Providers Defer versus Impose Their Views?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this